At the start of this year it
hit the headlines that a senior manager in the Treasury was
moving to a flexible work schedule. Instead of working every
hour God sends, he would now work a strict 9- 5.30. Clearly,
flexible work means something different in the inner circles of
the civil service. A positive statement about the long hours
culture it may have been, but it's some way away from making
significant inroads into flexible work.
Implementing time flexibility
in the workplace in most other cases means a variation from the
traditional 9-5 or 5.30. Beyond that, there is a wide variety of
practices, offering different amounts of structure, regularity
and flexibility.
We can group the options as
follows:
|
Variable hours |
-
flexitime
-
annualised hours
-
zero hours
-
time accounts
|
|
Restructured hours |
|
|
Reduced hours |
-
part-time
-
job-share
-
term-time working
-
phased retirement
|
|
Leave options |
|
Flex those hours
Many of the working arrangements generally
classified as "flexible" are flexible only in the sense that
there may be a degree of choice about finding a suitable working
option. Some options, however, may see greater or smaller
degrees of daily variation in the number of hours worked.
Flexitime
A flexible hours scheme, or flexitime, usually
involve working a set of "core hours" - perhaps 10 until 3 or 4,
with the ability to vary the hours either side of this.
Sometimes this is accompanied by the use of punch-cards and
time-clocks, introducing an element of factory-like discipline
into offices that may have previously relied on the vigilant eye
of a supervisor or office manager to see that everyone was doing
their hours.
These days it is more likely that
time-management software will be used to register and track
employee hours.
Alternatively, there may be a choice of temporal
patterns that can be chosen (usually a selection of 7.5 or 8
hour spells between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.). A supervisor can see
that there is sufficient office cover at all times, or teams can
be entrusted to work it out between themselves on an
equitable basis.
For employees the benefits are:
-
the opportunity to avoid rush-hour commutes
-
work-life balance advantages, e.g. in being able
to take a child to or from school, or leave early/start late to
allow time for sports training
-
the ability to schedule quiet times to get on
with work.
For employers the benefits are mainly in being
able to
-
recruit and retain staff who have other life
commitments or interests
-
schedule work across longer portions of the day,
so extending customer service.
Flexitime is reportedly losing favour amongst
managers who favour more predictable arrangements such as the
compressed working week. Badly run schemes risk becoming a
free-for-all where people roll in when they like and no-one know
what is going on, and this is a scenario greatly feared by
managers who prefer to "manage by eyeball".
But such attitudes are underpinned by
assumptions about performance - that people are only working
when you can see them and have high levels of control over their
scheduling. Instead managers need to be prepared, as far as
possible, to monitor by output. Otherwise they may work very
long days trying to keep an eye on their flexi-workers - the
ones who start early and the ones who leave late.
Flexitime on its own, however, does have an air
of being somewhat old-fashioned unless combined with flexible
place options. A requirement to attend the office during certain
core hours may well go beyond the pointless to the inefficient,
if the work that needs doing can be done from anywhere.
Annualised hours
An annualised hours scheme "does what it says on
tin" - an annual total of hours is agreed, and these are worked
in variable quantities over the year by agreement with the
employer.
These kinds of hours are most common in
industries that have peaks and troughs of demand, and can be a
way of getting round the need for overtime. In recent times it
has become more popular in the banking and financial services
industries, as they have moved towards call-centre based
operations and try to align operations more towards consumer
expectations.
There are a variety of types of scheme, but
typically the annual hours are based on a 35 to 40 hour week
multiplied up to an annual total, less annual leave and public
holidays. Scheduling work takes a variety of forms: there may be
an average monthly total to be worked, or it may take the form
of periods of intense working followed by periods of rest - e.g.
the two weeks on, two weeks off pattern found in the oil
industry.
In Europe there remains a requirement to conform
to the Working Time Directive, so that an average 48-hour week
is not exceeded and minimum rest periods are adhered to.
Annualised hours contracts have caused concern
in trade union circles due to the possibilities of exploitation,
health and safety issues related to periods of intense working,
and the erosion of overtime opportunities. but such arrangements
can in principle give employees who need it the variations of
employment intensity to dovetail with other aspirations in life.
Annualised hours can also work with part-time
arrangements, and may be scheduled so as to achieve de facto
term-time working.
Zero hours contracts
Zero hours arrangements have proved
controversial on a number of fronts. There is some doubt as to
whether in legal terms it constitutes a form of employment at
all. For some it conjures up images of oppressed wannabe burger
flippers waiting at the beck and call of exploitative employers,
obtaining crumbs of employment when the need (for the employer)
arises.
Such a contract is, in effect, an "on call
arrangement". Many agencies for temporary workers work on this
kind of basis. A relationship is entered into between employee
and an employer, but generally it is not characterised by
"mutuality of obligation" - the employer is not obliged to find
work, and the putative employee is not obliged to accept what is
offered.
Some employers may have a "pool" of temporary
workers "employed" on this basis. Sometimes the relationship can
include retainers to cover periods without allocation of work,
and can incorporate benefits such as training and use of
facilities, discounts, etc.
It's a work practice that encompasses a number
of grey areas, but one that may suit both parties in certain
circumstances. With or without being formalised, it can apply to
retired workers who enter an agreement to be called in as
necessary to provide the benefits of their experience.
Because of the overlap with temporary working,
this work option is often classified under a "flexible contract"
option rather than a "flexible time" option.
Time accounts
Time accounts are a formalisation of the age old
process of taking time off to compensate for extra time worked,
and vice versa. One can build up time credits in one's account
by working one's socks off - it's in some ways a more flexible
form of compressed working week or even annualised hours, with
the key ingredient that the employee achieves a greater degree
of "time sovereignty".
These kind of agreements are becoming more
common in continental Europe as a way of adding flexibility to
collective agreements between unions and employers on standard
levels of working time. Time accounts will therefore tend to
work within agreed parameters. Most time account agreements
specify a time within accounts have to be balanced, to prevent
huge holidays building up or excessive periods of working. They
also usually specify maximum credits (days off earned) and
debits (working days owed).
Time accounts can also tie in to employee
benefits schemes and other workplace initiatives - so credits
can be awarded for other reasons (e.g. instead of cash bonuses
or health insurance). In some Green Travel Plans time credits
are earned for not driving to work.
Compressed time options
An increasingly popular option is the
"compressed working week", which offers perhaps greater
regularity and predictability than the potentially more fluid
options above. Amongst the most common options are
-
the 4 day week, also referred to as a"4/10
schedule". Employees on this schedule work 4 10-hour days, with
the fifth day off
-
the "9 day fortnight", also referred to as a
9/80 schedule or 9/8 schedule. A "9/8 schedule" means that on 4
days per week you work 9 hours, and on the 5th you either work 8
hours or you have a day off. So for example, you may work 9-hour
days Monday through Thursday, and on Fridays, you either work an
8-hour day or take the day off. In England this schedule is
often known as a "nine-day fortnight" (meaning you have 9
working days every two weeks). 9/80 means that you work 80 hours
over 9 days, instead of the traditional 10. They all add up ton
much the same thing, in that you get an extra day off every
second week by working a little longer on the other days.
In all the options above, full-time hours can be
worked but in a different format to the traditional 9-5. It is
worth remembering that workers in primary industries,
manufacturing and many service industries such as hotel and
catering have always worked shifts outside the 9-5, and managers
have for decades been dreaming up innovative shift patterns to
achieve optimal use of human resources and plant. Much of the
apparent novelty stems from two aspects: application in office
environments, and allowing more autonomy to staff in finding
their most suitable working times.
On the next page we outline the
reduced hours
and leave options.
|